Metallica: Lars Ulrich – “..to get it sound loud”
- November 13th, 2008
- Posted in Album Reviews . Production
- By Jye Smith
- Write comment
A colleague at worked passed this over – “Lars Ulrich Defends Sound Quality Of Metallica’s Death Magnetic“. Sure, everyone can have a whinge about the quality of an album’s sound – that’s not new – but what astounded me was the shear lack of audio knowledge that Ulrich has. It was this next line that got me:
“But I’ve been listening to it the last couple of days in my car, and it sounds … smokin’.”
When I was about 14 I learnt a very valuable lesson from a man named Tom Gibson — a biomechanical engineer with a masters in acoustics. He explained to me that I should not pour money into a sound system that sounds crystal clear in a shop with a custom built room. There are some really major reasons why:
- Your car has an engine. This engine makes a lot of noise and squashes any clarity from those particular frequency.
- There are other cars and noise creators on the road. Always remember you do not drive in a sound proof box.
I expect a member of a recording outfit of over 20 years to be aware of the same facts. Guess not. Ulrich’s second piece of gold was:
“[Producer] Rick Rubin’s whole thing is to try and get it to sound lively, to get it sound loud, to get it to sound exciting, to get it to jump out of the speakers.”
This is bullshit. Fucking bullshit. Loud albums are ridiculously unmoving and un-dynamic because they’re never quiet — so the listener simply hears the one volume the whole way through.
Just like some of the most beautiful pictures in the world — it’s the negative space that is sometimes the most important. The notes you don’t play. The lines you don’t draw. You need comparison to get perspective.
The Wall Street Journal had a fantastic piece on the album including quotes from many professional engineers.
Ted Jensen (the album’s mastering engineer) said that the sound of the Guitar Hero version of the album is far superior to the CD.
Can a Metallica album be too loud?
Responding to a Metallica fan’s email about loudness, Mr. Jensen sent a sympathetic reply that concluded: “Believe me, I’m not proud to be associated with this one.”
“When there’s no quiet, there can be no loud,” said Matt Mayfield
I think the commentary on digital was very interesting:
But digital technology made it possible to squeeze all of the sound into a narrow, high-volume range. In addition, music now is often optimized for play on the relatively low-fidelity earbuds for iPods, reducing incentives to offer a broad dynamic range.
Sound engineers say artists who insist on loudness paradoxically give people less to hear, because they end up wiping away nuances and details. Everything from a gently strummed guitar to a pounding snare drum is equally loud, leading to what some call “ear fatigue.” If the listener turns down the volume knob, the music loses even more of its punch.
…if you play a newly released CD right after one that’s 15 years old, leaving the volume knob untouched, the new one is likely to sound four to eight times as loud. Many who’ve followed the controversy say “Death Magnetic” has one of the narrowest dynamic ranges ever on an album.



I whole-heartedly agree. Death Magnetic is the last Metallica album I will ever associate my eftpos card with!
Yep. Probably there most torrented album. ;)
In my studies of music/audio engineering I have not read of any reputable engineer who actual favours hyper-compression for those reasons. It might make the music as loud as it possibly can be … but it doesn’t actually sound loud because there’s no dynamics.
Driving steady at 100 km/h is not as fun as accelerating from 0-100 :-)
However I have read the recommendation before of listening to a track in a car because it will sound different and it’s good to get a different perspective on the sound. Not everyone listens to music on the same Yamaha, Mackie or Stanon monitors that the sound engineer mastering the track uses … people listen to music in cars, so it’s important to take that into consideration.
It’s just like developing a website for Firefox and then cross-browser retrofitting it for IE and Safari :-)
Isn’t the mark of a well audio engineered song that it appeals to people on a tinny old clapped out radio. Clock radio or their audio perfect stereo system. If the Audio Engineer isn’t taking that into account get a new engineer. Mind you Metallica is so far from reality these days that they maybe just ignoring the basics.
Note – not longer a fan of Metallica, they have just lost it.
That is the best analogy I’ve heard. Nice.
Oh I don’t agree with sole listening to it in the studio on the monitors. I think a nice well rounded test is needed (laptop speakers, cheap headphones, standard hifis etc) but what kind of car is driving? hummer? with a nice sub and tweeters to match? my car does. my parents sure as hell doesn’t. It’ just a piss poor argument from an industry veteran in my opinion.
@gary: great points. if the product is mixed and mastered well, it should always sound balanced.